Neuroscience Research Article Peer Review Form

Reviewer Name Article Title Article Author(s) Review Date

---

Summary

Brief summary of the article

Significance

Comment on the significance and novelty of the work

Scientific Quality

Assess scientific quality and rigor of the research

Experimental Design & Methods

Evaluate the experimental design and appropriateness of the methods

Results & Interpretation

Comment on the validity of results and their interpretation

Clarity & Organization

Comment on clarity, organization, and writing quality

References

Are the references adequate and relevant?

Ethical Concerns

Any ethical concerns or issues?

Recommendation

Recommendation Accept Minor Revision Major Revision Reject Justification for Recommendation

Additional Comments to Authors

Additional comments

Comments to Editor (not shown to authors)

Confidential comments