Physics Experimental Study Peer Review Checklist

Title of Study
Authors
Reviewer
Date of Review

Is the research question clearly stated? Is the hypothesis clearly defined and testable? Are the experimental methods described in sufficient detail? Are the controls adequate and appropriate? Are variables clearly identified (independent, dependent, controlled)? Is the data collection process transparent and reproducible? Is the data analysis appropriate and justified? Are statistical/computational tools properly used? Are the results clearly presented? Are figures, graphs, and tables clear and relevant? Are the conclusions supported by the data? Are limitations addressed? Are alternative explanations considered? Are references appropriately cited? Are ethical standards addressed?

Recommendation