Conference Paper Peer Review Evaluation Form
Paper Title
Paper ID
Reviewer Name
Reviewer Email
Evaluation Criteria
Originality
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Significance
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Technical Quality
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Clarity of Presentation
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevance to Conference
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments for Authors
Comments for Committee
Overall Recommendation
Strong Accept
Accept
Weak Accept
Borderline
Weak Reject
Reject
Strong Reject